LiveZilla Live Chat Software

Constellation, le dépôt institutionnel de l'Université du Québec à Chicoutimi

Lumbar stabilisation exercises versus back endurance-resistance exercise training in athletes with chronic low back pain: Protocol of a randomised controlled trial

Nowotny Alexandre Henrique, Calderon Mariane Guizeline, de Souza Pablo Albuquerque, Aguiar Andreo Fernando, Léonard Guillaume, Oliveira-Alves Bruno Mazziotti, Amorim Cesar F. et da Silva Rubens Alexandre. (2018). Lumbar stabilisation exercises versus back endurance-resistance exercise training in athletes with chronic low back pain: Protocol of a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine, 4, (1), e000452.

[img]
Prévisualisation
PDF - Version publiée
Disponible sous licence Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial.

410kB

URL officielle: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjsem-2018-000452

Résumé

Background: Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is an important disorder in athletes that may negatively affect their performance in competitions. The literature usually recommends physiotherapy based on exercises for back pain management in athletes. Recent evidence suggests that interventions based on lumbar muscle stabilisation exercises (LMSE) and back endurance-resistance exercises (BERE) may improve back pain and function performance. However, it is still unclear which type of exercise is more effective for the treatment of CLBP in athletes.

Objective: To compare the efficacy of LMSE versus BERE in athletes with CLBP.

Design: The study is a 2-arm, prospectively registered, randomised controlled trial.

Setting: The physical therapy clinical and biomechanics laboratory of the UNOPAR University.

Participants: 32 male athletes with CLBP, age between 18 and 40 years old, recruited from the local community.

Intervention: An 8-week intervention programme will be carried out with LMSE s versus BERE.

Measurements Trunk neuromuscular patterns during balance tasks (unipodal and over a ball) using electromyography and force platform parameters, pain, disability, fear and avoidance will be assessed by a blinded assessor at baseline and at follow-up after 8 weeks of intervention period.

Limitations: The absence of blinding intervention and the exclusion of female athletes, seated sports and swimmers will affect the internal and external validity of the study.

Conclusions: The results of this study will elucidate which of these two interventions promote better results in trunk neuromuscular pattern, back pain and function in male athletes with CLBP.

Type de document:Article publié dans une revue avec comité d'évaluation
Volume:4
Numéro:1
Pages:e000452
Version évaluée par les pairs:Oui
Date:2018
Sujets:Sciences de la santé
Sciences de la santé > Sciences de l'activité physique et réadaptation
Sciences de la santé > Sciences de l'activité physique et réadaptation > Physiothérapie
Département, module, service et unité de recherche:Départements et modules > Département des sciences de la santé > Unité d'enseignement en physiothérapie
Mots-clés:athletes, chronic low back pain, electromyography, fatigue, rehabilitation, therapeutic exercise
Déposé le:10 avr. 2019 00:06
Dernière modification:10 avr. 2019 00:06
Afficher les statistiques de telechargements

Éditer le document (administrateurs uniquement)

Creative Commons LicenseSauf indication contraire, les documents archivés dans Constellation sont rendus disponibles selon les termes de la licence Creative Commons "Paternité, pas d'utilisation commerciale, pas de modification" 2.5 Canada.

Bibliothèque Paul-Émile-Boulet, UQAC
555, boulevard de l'Université
Chicoutimi (Québec)  CANADA G7H 2B1
418 545-5011, poste 5630