LiveZilla Live Chat Software

Constellation, le dépôt institutionnel de l'Université du Québec à Chicoutimi

Exercises for mechanical neck disorders (Review)

Gross Anita, Kay Theresa M., Paquin Jean-Philippe, Blanchette Samuel, Lalonde Patrick, Christie Trevor, Dupont Geneviève, Graham Nadine, Burnie Stephen J., Gelley Geoff, Goldsmith Charles H., Forget Mario, Hoving Jan L., Bronfort Gert et Santaguida Pasqualina L.. (2015). Exercises for mechanical neck disorders (Review). Cochrane Systematic Review - Intervention, (1),

[img] PDF - Version publiée
Administrateurs seulement

115kB

URL officielle: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004250.pub5

Résumé

Background: Neck pain is common, disabling and costly. Exercise is one treatment approach.

Objectives: To assess the effectiveness of exercises to improve pain, disability, function, patient satisfaction, quality of life and global perceived effect in adults with neck pain.

Search methods: We searched MEDLINE, MANTIS, ClinicalTrials.gov and three other computerized databases up to between January and May 2014 plus additional sources (reference checking, citation searching, contact with authors).

Selection criteria: We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing single therapeutic exercise with a control for adults suffering from neck pain with or without cervicogenic headache or radiculopathy.

Data collection and analysis: Two review authors independently conducted trial selection, data extraction, 'Risk of bias' assessment and clinical relevance. The quality of the evidence was assessed using GRADE. Meta‐analyses were performed for relative risk and standardized mean differences (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) after judging clinical and statistical heterogeneity.

Main results: Twenty‐seven trials (2485 analyzed /3005 randomized participants) met our inclusion criteria. For acute neck pain only, no evidence was found. For chronic neck pain, moderate quality evidence supports 1) cervico‐scapulothoracic and upper extremity strength training to improve pain of a moderate to large amount immediately post treatment [pooled SMD (SMDp) ‐0.71 (95% CI: ‐1.33 to ‐0.10)] and at short‐term follow‐up; 2) scapulothoracic and upper extremity endurance training for slight beneficial effect on pain at immediate post treatment and short‐term follow‐up; 3) combined cervical, shoulder and scapulothoracic strengthening and stretching exercises varied from a small to large magnitude of beneficial effect on pain at immediate post treatment [SMDp ‐0.33 (95% CI: ‐0.55 to ‐0.10)] and up to long‐term follow‐up and a medium magnitude of effect improving function at both immediate post treatment and at short‐term follow‐up [SMDp ‐0.45 (95%CI: ‐0.72 to ‐0.18)]; 4) cervico‐scapulothoracic strengthening/stabilization exercises to improve pain and function at intermediate term [SMDp ‐14.90 (95% CI:‐22.40 to ‐7.39)]; 5) Mindfulness exercises (Qigong) minimally improved function but not global perceived effect at short term. Low evidence suggests 1) breathing exercises; 2) general fitness training; 3) stretching alone; and 4) feedback exercises combined with pattern synchronization may not change pain or function at immediate post treatment to short‐term follow‐up. Very low evidence suggests neuromuscular eye‐neck co‐ordination/proprioceptive exercises may improve pain and function at short‐term follow‐up. For chronic cervicogenic headache, moderate quality evidence supports static‐dynamic cervico‐scapulothoracic strengthening/endurance exercises including pressure biofeedback immediate post treatment and probably improves pain, function and global perceived effect at long‐term follow‐up. Low grade evidence supports sustained natural apophyseal glides (SNAG) exercises. For acute radiculopathy, low quality evidence suggests a small benefit for pain reduction at immediate post treatment with cervical stretch/strengthening/stabilization exercises.

Authors' conclusions: No high quality evidence was found, indicating that there is still uncertainty about the effectiveness of exercise for neck pain. Using specific strengthening exercises as a part of routine practice for chronic neck pain, cervicogenic headache and radiculopathy may be beneficial. Research showed the use of strengthening and endurance exercises for the cervico‐scapulothoracic and shoulder may be beneficial in reducing pain and improving function. However, when only stretching exercises were used no beneficial effects may be expected. Future research should explore optimal dosage.

Type de document:Article publié dans une revue avec comité d'évaluation
Numéro:1
Version évaluée par les pairs:Oui
Date:2015
Sujets:Sciences de la santé
Sciences de la santé > Sciences de l'activité physique et réadaptation
Sciences de la santé > Sciences de l'activité physique et réadaptation > Physiothérapie
Département, module, service et unité de recherche:Départements et modules > Département des sciences de la santé > Unité d'enseignement en physiothérapie
Mots-clés:acute pain, chronic pain, headache, manipulation, chiropractic methods, neck pain, pain management, physical therapy, radiculopathy, douleur aigüe, douleur chronique, maux de tête, céphalée, manipulation de chiropraxie, douleur au cou, douleur cervicale, cervicalgie, gestion de la douleur, physiothérapie, radiculopathie
Déposé le:28 août 2019 22:23
Dernière modification:28 août 2019 22:23
Afficher les statistiques de telechargements

Éditer le document (administrateurs uniquement)

Creative Commons LicenseSauf indication contraire, les documents archivés dans Constellation sont rendus disponibles selon les termes de la licence Creative Commons "Paternité, pas d'utilisation commerciale, pas de modification" 2.5 Canada.

Bibliothèque Paul-Émile-Boulet, UQAC
555, boulevard de l'Université
Chicoutimi (Québec)  CANADA G7H 2B1
418 545-5011, poste 5630