Constellation, le dépôt institutionnel de l'Université du Québec à Chicoutimi

Checklist on the quality of the repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation (rPMS) methods in research: An international Delphi study

Schneider Cyril, Zangrandi Andrea, Sollmann Nico, Bonfert Michaela Veronika et Beaulieu Louis-David. (2022). Checklist on the quality of the repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation (rPMS) methods in research: An international Delphi study. Frontiers in Neurology, 13, e852848.

[thumbnail of fneur-13-852848 (1).pdf]
Prévisualisation
PDF - Version publiée
Disponible sous licence Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY 2.5).

1MB

URL officielle: https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2022.852848

Résumé

An increasing number of clinical research studies have used repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation (rPMS) in recent years to alleviate pain or improve motor function. rPMS is non-invasive, painless, and administrated over peripheral nerve, spinal cord roots, or a muscle using a coil affixed to the skin and connected to a rapid-rate magnetic stimulator. Despite the clinical impact and scientific interest, the methodological inconsistencies or incomplete details and findings between studies could make the rPMS demonstration difficult to replicate. Given the lack of guidelines in rPMS literature, the present study aimed at developing a checklist to improve the quality of rPMS methods in research. An international panel of experts identified among those who had previously published on the topic were enrolled in a two-round web-based Delphi study with the aim of reaching a consensus on the items that should be reported or controlled in any rPMS study. The consensual rPMS checklist obtained comprises 8 subject-related items (e.g., age, sex), 16 methodological items (e.g., coil type, pulse duration), and 11 stimulation protocol items (e.g., paradigm of stimulation, number of pulses). This checklist will contribute to new interventional or exploratory rPMS research to guide researchers or clinicians on the methods to use to test and publish rPMS after-effects. Overall, the checklist will guide the peer-review process on the quality of rPMS methods reported in a publication. Given the dynamic nature of a consensus between international experts, it is expected that future research will affine the checklist.

Type de document:Article publié dans une revue avec comité d'évaluation
ISSN:1664-2295
Volume:13
Pages:e852848
Version évaluée par les pairs:Oui
Date:2022
Identifiant unique:10.3389/fneur.2022.852848
Sujets:Sciences de la santé
Sciences de la santé > Sciences de l'activité physique et réadaptation
Sciences de la santé > Sciences de l'activité physique et réadaptation > Physiothérapie
Sciences de la santé > Sciences médicales
Département, module, service et unité de recherche:Départements et modules > Département des sciences de la santé > Unité d'enseignement en physiothérapie
Mots-clés:Delphi study, non-invasive neurostimulation, peripheral neurostimulation, rPMS checklist, repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation, Étude Delphi, neurostimulation non invasive, neurostimulation périphérique, liste de contrôle rPMS, stimulation magnétique périphérique répétitive.
Déposé le:18 janv. 2023 16:42
Dernière modification:18 janv. 2023 16:42
Afficher les statistiques de telechargements

Éditer le document (administrateurs uniquement)

Creative Commons LicenseSauf indication contraire, les documents archivés dans Constellation sont rendus disponibles selon les termes de la licence Creative Commons "Paternité, pas d'utilisation commerciale, pas de modification" 2.5 Canada.

Bibliothèque Paul-Émile-Boulet, UQAC
555, boulevard de l'Université
Chicoutimi (Québec)  CANADA G7H 2B1
418 545-5011, poste 5630