Steyaert Sam M. J. G., Zedrosser Andreas, Elfström Marcus, Ordiz Andrés, Leclerc Martin, Frank Shane C., Kindberg Jonas, Stoen Ole‐Gunnar, Brunberg Sven et Swenson Jon E.. (2016). Ecological implications from spatial patterns in human‐caused brown bear mortality. Wildlife Biology, 22, (4), p. 144-152.
Prévisualisation |
PDF
- Version publiée
Disponible sous licence Creative Commons (CC-BY 2.5). 121kB |
URL officielle: http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.2981/wlb.00165
Résumé
Humans are important agents of wildlife mortality, and understanding such mortality is paramount for effective population management and conservation. However, the spatial mechanisms behind wildlife mortality are often assumed rather than tested, which can result in unsubstantiated caveats in ecological research (e.g. fear ecology assumptions) and wildlife conservation and/or management (e.g. ignoring ecological traps). We investigated spatial patterns in human‐caused mortality based on 30 years of brown bear Ursus arctos mortality data from a Swedish population. We contrasted mortality data with random locations and global positioning system relocations of live bears, as well as between sex, age and management classes (‘problem’ versus ‘no problem’ bear, before and after changing hunting regulations), and we used resource selection functions to identify potential ecological sinks (i.e. avoided habitat with high mortality risk) and traps (i.e. selected habitat with high mortality risk). We found that human‐caused mortality and mortality risk were positively associated with human presence and access. Bears removed as a management measure were killed in closer proximity to humans than hunter‐killed bears, and supplementary feeding of bears did not alter the spatial structure of human‐caused bear mortality. We identified areas close to human presence as potential sink habitat and agricultural fields (oat fields in particular) as potential ecological traps in our study area. We emphasize that human‐caused mortality in bears and maybe in wildlife generally can show a very local spatial structure, which may have far‐reaching population effects. We encourage researchers and managers to systematically collect and geo‐reference wildlife mortality data, in order to verify general ecological assumptions and to inform wildlife managers about critical habitat types. The latter is especially important for vulnerable or threatened populations.
Type de document: | Article publié dans une revue avec comité d'évaluation |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1903-220X |
Volume: | 22 |
Numéro: | 4 |
Pages: | p. 144-152 |
Version évaluée par les pairs: | Oui |
Date: | Juillet 2016 |
Nombre de pages: | 9 |
Identifiant unique: | 10.2981/wlb.00165 |
Sujets: | Sciences naturelles et génie > Sciences naturelles > Biologie et autres sciences connexes |
Département, module, service et unité de recherche: | Départements et modules > Département des sciences fondamentales Unités de recherche > Centre de recherche sur la Boréalie (CREB) |
Mots-clés: | Ursus arctos, brown bear, human-caused mortality, spatial structure, conservation |
Déposé le: | 04 déc. 2023 19:00 |
---|---|
Dernière modification: | 04 déc. 2023 19:00 |
Éditer le document (administrateurs uniquement)