Constellation, le dépôt institutionnel de l'Université du Québec à Chicoutimi

Are nonsocial species more social than we think? Seasonal patterns in sociality in a solitary terrestrial carnivore

Heeres Rick W., Leclerc Martin, Frank Shane, Kopatz Alexander, Pelletier Fanie et Zedrosser Andreas. (2024). Are nonsocial species more social than we think? Seasonal patterns in sociality in a solitary terrestrial carnivore. Animal Behaviour, 216, p. 107-130.

[thumbnail of Heeres_et_al_2024_AnimalBehaviour.pdf]
Prévisualisation
PDF - Version publiée
Disponible sous licence Creative Commons (CC-BY 4.0).

3MB

URL officielle: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2024.07.022

Résumé

Animal sociality, the extent and manner in which conspecifics associate with each other, ultimately affects an individual's survival and reproductive success. It is shaped by the spatiotemporal configuration and composition of the social units (e.g. individual, pair, group) in a population. Here, we assessed the formation and structure of social networks of a presumed nonsocial species with individual-based movement data of 153 GPS-marked brown bears, Ursus arctos. We explored changes in the frequency of dyadic associations in relation to distinct seasonal patterns (i.e. mating, hyperphagia and hunting seasons) that affect bear behaviour. We found seasonally distinctive frequencies in brown bear associations throughout their active period and that reproduction was the main driver for associations in the population, that is, the highest frequency of associations occurred during the mating season and male–female dyads during the mating season included the majority (73%) of observed associations. We also observed dyadic associations during the hyperphagia and hunting seasons, but found no significant changes in frequency during these seasons. In addition, we found that social structures during both the mating and nonmating periods were nonrandom, that is, dyadic associations occurred more often than expected. Animal sociality is commonly viewed as a classification of social versus nonsocial, but our results suggest that it is rather a dynamic continuum primarily influenced by variation in a species' spatiotemporal configuration (i.e. seasonal movements, social unit structure) and demographic composition (i.e. age, sex). Our results also support the contention that studies focusing on animal sociality should include a sociospatial perspective, as both components are tightly linked. Since sociality can affect individual fitness, and vice versa, advancing the knowledge on assumed ‘solitary’ species is paramount for the conservation and sustainable management of their populations.

Type de document:Article publié dans une revue avec comité d'évaluation
ISSN:00033472
Volume:216
Pages:p. 107-130
Version évaluée par les pairs:Oui
Date:Octobre 2024
Nombre de pages:24
Identifiant unique:10.1016/j.anbehav.2024.07.022
Sujets:Sciences naturelles et génie > Sciences naturelles > Biologie et autres sciences connexes
Département, module, service et unité de recherche:Départements et modules > Département des sciences fondamentales
Unités de recherche > Centre de recherche sur la Boréalie (CREB)
Mots-clés:Ursus arctos, brown bears, conspecific interaction, network analysis, nonterritorial, social behaviour, Sweden
Déposé le:09 sept. 2024 12:23
Dernière modification:09 sept. 2024 12:23
Afficher les statistiques de telechargements

Éditer le document (administrateurs uniquement)

Creative Commons LicenseSauf indication contraire, les documents archivés dans Constellation sont rendus disponibles selon les termes de la licence Creative Commons "Paternité, pas d'utilisation commerciale, pas de modification" 2.5 Canada.

Bibliothèque Paul-Émile-Boulet, UQAC
555, boulevard de l'Université
Chicoutimi (Québec)  CANADA G7H 2B1
418 545-5011, poste 5630